Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
J Clin Med ; 12(11)2023 May 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37297969

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Treatment of Peritoneal Surface Malignancies (PSM) with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has achieved results never seen before in these patients, which classically have a poor prognosis. The possibility of conducting clinical trials in these diseases is complicated, since some of them are rare, so the analysis of large databases provides very valuable scientific information. The aim of this study is to analyze the global results of the National Registry of the Spanish Group of Peritoneal Oncologic Surgery (REGECOP), whose objective is to register all patients scheduled for HIPEC nationwide. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of the data recorded in the REGECOP from 36 Spanish hospitals from 2001 to 2021. There were 4159 surgical interventions in 3980 patients. RESULTS: 66% are women and 34% are men with a median age of 59 years (range 17-86). 41.5% of the patients were treated for Peritoneal Metastases (PM) of colorectal cancer (CRC); 32.4% were women with ovarian cancer (OC) with PM; 12.8% were treated for pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP); 6.2% had PM from gastric cancer (GC); 4.9% had PM of non-conventional origin; and, finally, 2.1% of cases were patients diagnosed with peritoneal mesothelioma. The median Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) was 9 (0-39), and complete cytoreduction was achieved in 81.7% of the procedures. Severe morbidity (Dindo-Clavien grade III-IV) was observed in 17.7% of surgeries, with 2.1% mortality. Median hospital stay was 11 days (0-259). Median overall survival (OS) was 41 months for CRC patients, 55 months for women with OC, was not reached in PMP patients, was 14 months for GC patients, and 66 months in mesothelioma patients. CONCLUSIONS: large databases provide extremely useful data. CRS with HIPEC in referral centers is a safe treatment with encouraging oncologic results in PSM.

2.
BMC Cancer ; 22(1): 536, 2022 May 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35549912

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The French PRODIGE 7 trial, published on January 2021, has raised doubts about the specific survival benefit provided by HIPEC with oxaliplatin 460 mg/m2 (30 minutes) for the treatment of peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer. However, several methodological flaws have been identified in PRODIGE 7, specially the HIPEC protocol or the choice of overall survival as the main endpoint, so its results have not been assumed as definitive, emphasizing the need for further research on HIPEC. It seems that the HIPEC protocol with high-dose mytomicin-C (35 mg/m2) is the preferred regime to evaluate in future clinical studies. METHODS: GECOP-MMC is a prospective, open-label, randomized, multicenter phase IV clinical trial that aims to evaluate the effectiveness of HIPEC with high-dose mytomicin-C in preventing the development of peritoneal recurrence in patients with limited peritoneal metastasis from colon cancer (not rectal), after complete surgical cytoreduction. This study will be performed in 31 Spanish HIPEC centres, starting in March 2022. Additional international recruiting centres are under consideration. Two hundred sixteen patients with PCI ≤ 20, in which complete cytoreduction (CCS 0) has been obtained, will be randomized intraoperatively to arm 1 (with HIPEC) or arm 2 (without HIPEC). We will stratified randomization by surgical PCI (1-10; 11-15; 16-20). Patients in both arms will be treated with personalized systemic chemotherapy. Primary endpoint is peritoneal recurrence-free survival at 3 years. An ancillary study will evaluate the correlation between surgical and pathological PCI, comparing their respective prognostic values. DISCUSSION: HIPEC with high-dose mytomicin-C, in patients with limited (PCI ≤ 20) and completely resected (CCS 0) peritoneal metastases, is assumed to reduce the expected risk of peritoneal recurrence from 50 to 30% at 3 years. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT number: 2019-004679-37; Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05250648 (registration date 02/22/2022, ).


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Hipertermia Inducida , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Neoplasias Peritoneales , Neoplasias del Recto , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias del Colon/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias del Colon/cirugía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Terapia Combinada , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción , Humanos , Hipertermia Inducida/métodos , Quimioterapia Intraperitoneal Hipertérmica , Mitomicina/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Peritoneales/secundario , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias del Recto/terapia , Tasa de Supervivencia
3.
Dig Surg ; 33(1): 26-32, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26569389

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Gastrografin represents a useful tool in the diagnosis and management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO). The aim of this study is to identify variables with negative influence in nonoperative management with gastrografin. METHODS: From August 2008 to March 2013, 223 consecutive patients with 235 episodes of ASBO were included and received gastrografin. A protocol for prospective data collection was developed. In order to explore factors related to the failure of nonoperative treatment, univariate and multivariate analysis were performed. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety eight episodes responded to nonoperative treatment (84.2% of success) and 33 patients (15.8%) required surgical intervention. Only 3 patients of the gastrografin cohort with contrast in colon, required surgery. Predictive factors of failure of nonoperative management with gastrografin were patients aged above 65 (p = 0.01; OR 1.791, 95% CI 1.41-2.19), with a history of 2 or more previous laparotomies (p = 0.03; OR 2.91, 95% CI 2.19-3.71), and who had undergone previous abdominal surgery due to ASBO (p = 0.002; OR 1.381, 95% CI 1.10-1.79). CONCLUSION: Patient age, the number of previous laparotomies, and the fact that previous abdominal surgery was conducted due to ASBO are indicative of unsuccessful management with gastrografin.


Asunto(s)
Medios de Contraste , Diatrizoato de Meglumina , Obstrucción Intestinal/terapia , Intestino Delgado/diagnóstico por imagen , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Adherencias Tisulares/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Obstrucción Intestinal/diagnóstico por imagen , Obstrucción Intestinal/etiología , Intestino Delgado/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Prospectivos , Radiografía , Adherencias Tisulares/diagnóstico por imagen , Adherencias Tisulares/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...